View source for First Accountability and Transparency Review

{{Articles needing attention}}

The '''First Accountability and Transparency Review''' (ATRT1) was conducted between 2010 and 2011, with implementation of recommendations from the review stretching into 2013.<ref name="dashboard">[https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/atrt1-progress-milestones-2019-08-06-en ICANN.org - ATRT1 Dashboard], last updated August 6, 2019</ref>

<!--
<timeline>
# All measures are in pixels

ImageSize  = width:800 height:300
PlotArea   = left:50 right:50 bottom:20 top:20
AlignBars  = early

DateFormat = mm/dd/yyyy
Period     = from:01/01/2010 till:03/01/2013
TimeAxis   = orientation:horizontal
ScaleMajor = unit:year increment:1 start:01/01/2010
ScaleMinor = unit:month increment:1 gridcolor:skyblue start:01/01/2010

Define $dx = 25

BarData=
    Barset:Phases

PlotData=
   align:left textcolor:black fontsize:M mark:(line,black) width:15
   barset:Phases color:yellowgreen 
      from:01/13/2010 till:05/18/2010 shift:(42,-5) text:[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/call-for-applicants-11jan10-en.pdf|Initiation of Review]
      from:05/18/2010 till:08/10/2010 shift:(28,-5) text:[https://forum.icann.org/lists/atrt-questions-2010/pdfW0ZU92FBG5.pdf|Initial Public Comments]
      from:06/02/2010 till:08/10/2010 shift:($dx,-5) text:[https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2010-06-02-en|RFP for Independent Expert]
      from:08/10/2010 till:10/20/2010 shift:($dx,-5) text:[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-recommendations-20oct10-en.pdf|Drafting Proposed Recommendations]
      at:10/20/2010 shift:(2,-5) text:[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/review-berkman-final-report-20oct10-en.pdf|Expert Report Released]
      from:10/20/2010 till:12/15/2010 shift:($dx,-5) text:[https://forum.icann.org/lists/atrt-draft-proposed-recommendations/pdf2AXdrMUJSL.pdf|Public Comment on Proposed Recommendations]
      from:12/15/2010 till:12/31/2010 shift:($dx,-5) text:[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/final-recommendations-31dec10-en.pdf|Final Recommendations]
      from:12/31/2010 till:03/08/2011 shift:($dx,-5) text:[https://forum.icann.org/lists/atrt-final-recommendations/pdfhL3msytNxe.pdf|Public Comment on Final Recommendations]
      at:01/25/2011 shift:(2,-5) text:"[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/minutes-2011-01-25-en#10|Board Accepts Report & Requests Implementation Plan]"
      from:01/25/2011 till:06/24/2011 shift:(47,-5) text:"[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2011-06-24-en#2|Implementation Planning & Board Approval]"
      from:06/24/2011 till:01/29/2013 align:center shift:(0,-5)   text:"Implementation Phase"
</timeline>
-->

==Background==
===Origin and Purpose of Specific Reviews===
The [[Affirmation of Commitments]], an agreement between ICANN and the [[United States Department of Commerce]], establishes ICANN's obligations to perform its duties with specific commitments in mind. All of the commitments bear on public and consumer trust of the organization. ICANN is to perform its functions in a manner that:
*ensures accountability and transparency of decision-making;
*preserves the security, stability, and resiliency of the DNS;
*promotes competition, consumer trust, and consumer choice; and
*enables access to registration data; and
*periodically review and assess its performance through the lens of each of the above commitments.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/affirmation-of-commitments-2009-09-30-en ICANN.org - Affirmation of Commitments], September 30, 2009</ref>

ICANN's board enshrined these commitments (and the associated reviews) in its [[ICANN Bylaws|Bylaws]] in Article 1 (Mission, Commitments, and Core Values)<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/bylaws-en/#article1 ICANN Bylaws, Article 1]</ref> and in Article 4 (Accountability and Review).<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/bylaws-en/#article4 ICANN Bylaws, Article 4]</ref> Article 4.6 deals with "Specific Reviews," each of which are tied to one of the commitments in the Affirmation of Commitments.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/bylaws-en/#article4.6 ICANN Bylaws, Article 4.6]</ref>

The [[Organizational Effectiveness Committee]] of the board oversees the conduct of specific reviews.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/organizational-effectiveness-committee-2014-03-21-en ICANN.org - Organizational Effectiveness Committee]</ref> The ATRT is one such specific review.

===ATRT1 Team===
ATRT1 was composed of volunteer members: 1 from both the ASO and ALAC; 2 from the ccNSO; 4 from the GNSO; 4 from governments (including 2 ex-officio members); the chair of the ICANN Board; and 1 or 2 independent experts. The GAC's representatives to the ATRT included [[Manal Ismail]], an ex-officio member who is the designated nominee of former GAC chairman [[Janis Karklins]] and serves as vice-chair of ATRT1, [[Fabio Colossanti]] from the EU and [[Xinsheng Zhang]] from China.

==ATRT1 Process and Findings==
The call for volunteers for ATRT1 was published on January 11, 2010.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/call-for-applicants-11jan10-en.pdf Call for Volunteers], January 11, 2010</ref> The review team determined that an independent expert would be useful, and issued a request for proposals in June 2010.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2010-06-02-en ICANN.org - Request for Proposals], June 2, 2010</ref> In August 2010, the team selected the [[Berkman Center for Internet and Society]] as its independent expert for ATRT1.<ref name="update">[https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/accountability-and-transparency-review-team--selection-of-independent-expert-and-update-on-atrt-review-10-8-2010-en ICANN.org - Selection of Independent Expert and Update on ATRT Review], August 10, 2010</ref> They also divided into topic-driven working groups focusing on:
#Board performance;
#GAC Role in decision-making;
#Community and stakeholder engagement; and
#Independent review of board decisions.<ref name="update" />

===Public Comment Process - Questions to the Community===
The review team composed a list of questions for the community<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/community-questions-18may10-en.pdf Affirmation of Commitments - Questions for the Community], May 18, 2010</ref> and published them for public comment. Twenty-eight responses were received.<ref>[https://forum.icann.org/lists/atrt-questions-2010/pdfW0ZU92FBG5.pdf Staff Report on Public Comment Process], August 10, 2010</ref> 

===Berkman Center Findings===
The Berkman Center's report to the review team was submitted in October 2010.<ref name="bcreport">[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/review-berkman-final-report-20oct10-en.pdf Berkman Center Report - Accountability and Transparency at ICANN], October 20, 2010</ref> The report offered three summary findings:
#ICANN's performance regarding transparency is currently not meeting its potential across all areas reviewed and shows deficits along a number of dimensions. It calls for clearly defined improvements at the level of policy, information design, and decision making.
#ICANN has made significant process in improving its public participation mechanisms gets high marks regarding its overall trajectory in this regard. Remaining concerns about the practical impact of public participation on Board decisions are best addressed by increasing visibility and traceability of individual inputs, in order to clarify how these inputs ultimately factor into ICANN decision-making processes.
#ICANN's greates challenge ahead, despite significant recent efforts, remains corporate and Board governance. Proposed measures identified in this report aim to increase efficiency, transparency and accountability within the current context and in the absence of standard accountability mechanisms.<ref name="bcreport" />

===ATRT1 Draft Recommendations===
The review team consolidated the Berkman Center findings, along with the comments to its questions, and drafted a set of proposed recommendations for public comment.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-recommendations-20oct10-en.pdf ATRT1 - Proposed Recommendations], October 20, 2010</ref> The report presented the research results of each working group, as well as findings from the Berkman Center and review and analysis of the responses to the community questionnaire.

Fifteen total comments, from thirteen commenters, were received on the draft recommendations.<ref>[https://forum.icann.org/lists/atrt-draft-proposed-recommendations/pdf2AXdrMUJSL.pdf Summary of Public Comments], December 15, 2010</ref>

==Final Report and Implementation==
The review team submitted its final report to the ICANN Board on December 31, 2010.<ref name="finalreport">[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/final-recommendations-31dec10-en.pdf ATRT1 - Final Recommendations], December 31, 2010</ref> The report included twenty-seven recommendations, mainly divided across the four topic areas described above.<ref name="finalreport" /> The report was also submitted for public comment, and received a total of ten substantive comments.<ref>[https://forum.icann.org/lists/atrt-final-recommendations/pdfhL3msytNxe.pdf Summary Report on Public Comment Process], March 8, 2011</ref>

Regarding the GAC's role, effectiveness, and interaction with the Board, the ATRT recommended the following:
* The GAC-Board Joint Working Group needs to clarify what constitutes GAC public policy "advice" under the Bylaws.
* After establishing the formal context of GAC public policy "advice," the ICANN Board should develop a more formal documented process to notify and request GAC advice regarding public policy issues. 
* ICANN should be proactive in requesting GAC advice in writing. Documentation of requests should be housed in a database, including the request and all advice received by ICANN from the GAC.
* The Board and GAC should work together to ensure that GAC advice is provided and considered on time.
* The Board should establish a joint working group to formally document the process through which ICANN responds to GAC advice. The process must require ICANN to provide specific information in a timely manner regarding its position, whether it agrees or disagrees with GAC advice, and for both parties to find mutually acceptable solutions in good faith. The Board and GAC must also establish strategies to ensure that relevant provisions in the Bylaws are met.
* The Board should develop and implement mechanisms to engage the GAC earlier in the policy development process.
* The Board and GAC should work together to create and implement actions to ensure that GAC is well informed regarding ICANN's policy agenda. Both parties should also consider creating/evaluating the role and necessary skills of the ICANN Support Staff to ensure that effective communication is provided.
* The Board is encouraged to increase the level of support and commitment to the GAC process by: encouraging member countries, particularly developing countries, to participate in GAC deliberations; providing multilingual access to ICANN records; and developing a process to identify how and when ICANN deals with senior government officials on public policy issues on a regular or collective basis to complement the GAC process.

At its January 25, 2011 board meeting, the ICANN Board accepted the report and directed ICANN staff to formulate and propose an implementation plan.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/minutes-2011-01-25-en#10 Resolution of the Board], January 25, 2011</ref> On June 24, 2011, the board approved all recommendations but one (which required an independent study to assess its feasibility), and announced a plan to maintain regular updates on the implementation of the recommendations.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2011-06-24-en#2 Resolution of the Board], June 24, 2011.</ref> 

In January 2013, the Board posted its final update on implementation proceedings, noting the work that had been completed in 2012 and providing summary updates on all twenty-seven recommendations from ATRT1.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atrt-implementation-report-29jan13-en.pdf ATRT Implementation Report], January 29, 2013.</ref> ICANN considers ATRT1 to be complete.<ref name="dashboard" />

==References==
{{reflist}}

[[Category:Specific Reviews]]
[[Category:ICANN]]