Geographic Names Panel: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Christiane (talk | contribs) m Text replacement - "Category:New gTLD Program" to "Category:New gTLD Program (2012)" |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Organization | |||
| logo = | |||
| organization_type = Consortium | |||
| focus = Geographic names evaluation | |||
| date_founded = November 22, 2011 | |||
| founders = ICANN | |||
| ownership = ICANN | |||
| country = | |||
| city = | |||
| subsidiaries = | |||
| website = https://newgtlds.icann.org/sites/default/files/geo-names-process-07jun13-en.pdf | |||
| platform name = | |||
}} | |||
The '''Geographic Names Panel''' is one of multiple panels that are involved in [[ICANN]]'s initial evaluation process for [[New gTLD Program|new gTLD]]s. It is responsible for determining if the proposed new gTLD represents a geographic name (country or territory name, sub-national geographic name, city name, continent or UN Region) under the standards set forth by [[Applicant Guidebook]]. The panel will also evaluate if the geographic name being applied for requires government support and ensures that the supporting documents from government authorities included in the application are verified and original.<ref>[http://www.new-gtld.ch/faq.php What are the evaluation panels?]</ref> <ref> | The '''Geographic Names Panel''' is one of multiple panels that are involved in [[ICANN]]'s initial evaluation process for [[New gTLD Program|new gTLD]]s. It is responsible for determining if the proposed new gTLD represents a geographic name (country or territory name, sub-national geographic name, city name, continent or UN Region) under the standards set forth by [[Applicant Guidebook]]. The panel will also evaluate if the geographic name being applied for requires government support and ensures that the supporting documents from government authorities included in the application are verified and original.<ref>[http://www.new-gtld.ch/faq.php What are the evaluation panels?]</ref> <ref> | ||
[http://archive.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/geographic-names-22oct08-en.pdf Proposed Process for Geographic Name Applications]</ref> | [http://archive.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/geographic-names-22oct08-en.pdf Proposed Process for Geographic Name Applications]</ref> | ||
| Line 5: | Line 19: | ||
It was predicted that the Geographic Names Panel would be able to finish its evaluation ahead of many of the other panels, finishing on or around November 12, 2012.<ref>[http://www.gtld.com/news/2012/icanns-new-gtld-program-latest-news ICANN new gTLD Program Latest News, www.gtld.com]</ref> | It was predicted that the Geographic Names Panel would be able to finish its evaluation ahead of many of the other panels, finishing on or around November 12, 2012.<ref>[http://www.gtld.com/news/2012/icanns-new-gtld-program-latest-news ICANN new gTLD Program Latest News, www.gtld.com]</ref> | ||
== | ===Google Violates Geographic Rules=== | ||
It was quickly noted following the public reveal that [[Google]] had applied for three strings that were clearly in violation of the protection of geographic territory names as per the [[ISO-3166]] standards. Their applications for [[.and]], [[.are]], and [[.est]] are all protected names on that list, for Andorra, the United Arab Emirates, and Estonia respectively. .and was intended for use as a [[Brand TLD]] for Google's android services, while .est and .are were intended as "domain hacks", so domains such as cats.are/best and fast.est/car would be made possible.<ref>[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/02/google_loses_money_applying_for_banned_domain_names/ Google Loses Money Applying for Banned Domain Names, TheRegister.co.uk]</ref> These applications were later withdrawn, though a full-refund was not given.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/10089-did-google-withdraw-three-new-gtld-applications Did Google Withdraw Three New gTLD Applications, DomainIncite.com]</ref> | |||
===Rulings=== | |||
On March 7th 2013, it was announced that the following strings refer to geographic areas but did not apply as geoTLDs: [[.bar]], [[.tata]], [[.tui]]; while the following strings applied for as geographic but do not actually refer to a geographic area: [[.ist]], [[.ryukyu]], [[.scot]], [[.vegas]], [[.frl]], [[.zulu]]. [[Kevin Murphy]], of [[Domain Incite]], noted that other TLDs referring to known geographic areas were not singled out, including: [[.capital]], [[.delta]].<ref>[http://domainincite.com/12166-told-you-so-four-new-gtlds-given-geographic-surprise-others-given-a-pass Told You So Four New gTLDs Given Geographic Surprise , DomainIncite.com] Published & Retrieved 7 Mar 2013</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
[[Category:New gTLD Program (2012)]] | |||
[[Category: | |||