Domain Privacy: Difference between revisions
Dustin Loup (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Applied modification ruleset: Automated workflow |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Domain Privacy is a service provided by [[registrars]] that prevents registrants' information from being listed in the [[WHOIS]] database. Registrars most commonly provide anonymity to the registrant by registering domains by proxy, listing the companies details in the WHOIS and providing a forwarding service. | '''Domain Privacy''' is a service provided by [[registrars]] that prevents registrants' information from being listed in the [[WHOIS]] database. Registrars most commonly provide anonymity to the registrant by registering domains by proxy, listing the companies details in the WHOIS and providing a forwarding service. | ||
ICANN requires that each registered domain provides contact information, including name, address, email, phone numbers and administrative and technical contents.<ref>[http://whois.icann.org/en/about-whois About WHOIS]</ref>Proxy services enable registrants' to meet this requirement and maintain anonymity. | ICANN requires that each registered domain provides contact information, including name, address, email, phone numbers and administrative and technical contents.<ref>[http://whois.icann.org/en/about-whois About WHOIS]</ref>Proxy services enable registrants' to meet this requirement and maintain anonymity. | ||
==Origin of Private Domain Services== | ==Origin of Private Domain Services== | ||
The public [[WHOIS]] database was created in the early 1980s, before [[ARPANET]] had become the | The public [[WHOIS]] database was created in the early 1980s, before [[ARPANET]] had become the Internet we know today. It was originally intended to be used as a directory service for resolving technical issues with ARPANET.<ref>David Lindsay, International Domain Name Law: ICANN and the UDRP, Hart Publishing, 2007</ref> While the primary use of WHOIS has shifted to become commercial in nature, the protocols have remained relatively unchanged.<ref>[http://whois.icann.org/en/history-whois WHOIS History]</ref> | ||
When the | When the Internet gained popularity, WHOIS became a service used by law enforcement, companies seeking to protect intellectual property and individuals trying to contact registrants with interest in purchasing their domains. While these uses may seem reasonable, the database also attracts data miners, that use the listed information for unethical, or even criminal and illegal purposes.<ref>[http://www.actnowdomains.com/the-privacy-conundrum-in-domain-registration.htm The Privacy Conundrum in Domain Registration]</ref> | ||
While these uses range between ethical and unethical, they reflect the changed | While these uses range between ethical and unethical purposes, they reflect the changed Internet landscape that led to a demand for privacy/proxy services. Registering a domain by proxy prevents registrants' information from being easily accessible to the public. | ||
==ICANN Policy== | ==ICANN Policy== | ||
===Current Policy=== | ===Current Policy=== | ||
The 2013 [[RAA]] became the first to address the issue of Domain Privacy, when the ICANN Board approved it on 27 June 2013. | The 2013 [[RAA]] became the first to address the issue of Domain Privacy, when the ICANN Board approved it on 27 June 2013. The Board was committed to having the new RAA in place prior to the delegation of gTLDs in the [[New gTLD Program]], leaving several issues unresolved, including those relating to Proxy and Private Registrations.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2013-06-27-en#2.b Board Resolution 27 June 2013]</ref> | ||
The Board adopted interim protections to be put in place until a formal policy could be implemented. These protections, due to expire at the end of 2016, placed the following requirements on providers of privacy/proxy services: | The Board adopted interim protections to be put in place until a formal policy could be implemented. These protections, due to expire at the end of 2016, placed the following requirements on providers of privacy/proxy services: | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
The only issue that failed to reach some level of consensus was whether domains actively used for commercial/financial transactions should be allowed to use P/P services. This has been the most contentious and controversial issue surrounding the Domain Privacy and the RAA more generally. | The only issue that failed to reach some level of consensus was whether domains actively used for commercial/financial transactions should be allowed to use P/P services. This has been the most contentious and controversial issue surrounding the Domain Privacy and the RAA more generally. | ||
==Privacy & Proxy Services vs Open Internet== | |||
The directory service is today a commercial package offered to the public by domain registering companies as a service. Where a client desires to limit the exposure of their private data to the public, they would be required to purchase privacy. While it is great that there are options to secure personal data, debates going on in Internet governance forums are that should it come at a cost and doesn't this impact negatively on the openness of the Internet. | |||
'''Timeline''' | '''Timeline''' | ||
| Line 51: | Line 54: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
[[Category:Glossary]] | |||