ICANNWiki

Prioritization Framework: Difference between revisions

← Older edit
GovernanceBot (talk | contribs)
Bots, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), Administrators, Trusted Users
17,736 edits
VisualWikitext
Jessica (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Check users, lookupuser, Administrators, translator
14,952 edits
No edit summary
Applied modification ruleset: Corrections using AWB-ICW patterns
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


==Background==
==Background==
ICANN's [[Multistakeholder Model]] provides for the development of consensus-driven, bottom-up policy and recommendations from the community of stakeholders in the ICANN ecosystem. Over time, the generation of policy proposals, consensus advice, and recommendations has outstripped the ICANN board and orginization's ability to implement such proposals. This has resulted in bottlenecks at the board and org levels around policy implementation: the attention of the board is strained by the number of inputs from constituent bodies; and within the organization, resource limitations make it challenging to respond to all of the mandates generated by board approval of recommendations.<ref name="icann72slides">[https://community.icann.org/display/projfinadhocws/13-October-2021+Planning+and+Prioritization+Framework+Design+Update?preview=/176623446/176623447/17-ICANN%2072%20Prep%20Week-%20Planning%20Prioritization%20Framework%20Project%20-10-13-21-%20Final.pdf ICANN 72 Archive - Presentation Slides - Planning Prioritization Framework Project] October 13, 2021</ref>  
ICANN's [[Multistakeholder Model]] provides for the development of consensus-driven, bottom-up policy and recommendations from the community of stakeholders in the ICANN ecosystem. Over time, the generation of policy proposals, consensus advice, and recommendations has outstripped the ICANN board and organization's ability to implement such proposals. This has resulted in bottlenecks at the board and org levels around policy implementation: the attention of the board is strained by the number of inputs from constituent bodies; and within the organization, resource limitations make it challenging to respond to all of the mandates generated by board approval of recommendations.<ref name="icann72slides">[https://community.icann.org/display/projfinadhocws/13-October-2021+Planning+and+Prioritization+Framework+Design+Update?preview=/176623446/176623447/17-ICANN%2072%20Prep%20Week-%20Planning%20Prioritization%20Framework%20Project%20-10-13-21-%20Final.pdf ICANN 72 Archive - Presentation Slides - Planning Prioritization Framework Project] October 13, 2021</ref>  


The [[Third Accountability and Transparency Review]] made several recommendations regarding the transparency of ICANN's decision-making process, as well as the creation of engagement processes for community-wide concerns. These included a proposed holistic review of ICANN's constituent organizations and refactoring of existing Organizational Reviews into continuous improvement processes.<ref name="atrt3final">[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atrt3-report-29may20-en.pdf ICANN.org - ATRT 3 Final Report], May 29, 2020</ref> In addition, the review team proposed the creation of a "consensus model" for prioritizing the work of ICANN org and the recommendations derived from [[Policy Development Process|policy development processes]], cross-community working groups, [[ICANN Reviews|organizational and specific reviews]], and other sources.<ref name="atrt3final" />
The [[Third Accountability and Transparency Review]] made several recommendations regarding the transparency of ICANN's decision-making process, as well as the creation of engagement processes for community-wide concerns. These included a proposed holistic review of ICANN's constituent organizations and refactoring of existing Organizational Reviews into continuous improvement processes.<ref name="atrt3final">[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atrt3-report-29may20-en.pdf ICANN.org - ATRT 3 Final Report], May 29, 2020</ref> In addition, the review team proposed the creation of a "consensus model" for prioritizing the work of ICANN org and the recommendations derived from [[Policy Development Process|policy development processes]], cross-community working groups, [[ICANN Reviews|organizational and specific reviews]], and other sources.<ref name="atrt3final" />
Line 58: Line 58:


====Recommendations Considered during the Pilot====
====Recommendations Considered during the Pilot====
In total, 45 recommendations were considered during the pilot.<ref>[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1HNnH4Wi2wmHqQcQ1hbT0pCY9Mz_moHEIiMvNZtN977U/edit#gid=2036121294 Prioritization Pilot Recommendations Spreadsheet, PPG, ICANN]</ref>
In total, 45 recommendations were considered during the pilot.<ref>[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1HNnH4Wi2wmHqQcQ1hbT0pCY9Mz_moHEIiMvNZtN977U/edit#gid=2036121294 Prioritization Pilot Recommendations Spreadsheet, PPG, ICANN]</ref> The finalized list of 2022 priorities was published on May 23, 2022.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/blogs/details/icann-fy23-and-fy24-planning-process-update-23-05-2022-en ICANN FY23/24 Priorities Process, Blogs, ICANN]</ref>
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"
|- style="font-weight:bold; background-color:#FCE5CD;"
|- style="font-weight:bold; background-color:#FCE5CD;"
Line 177: Line 177:
| style="background-color:#E06666;" | P1
| style="background-color:#E06666;" | P1
| style="text-align:left;" | needs to be run as a pilot first, to be designed with the community.
| style="text-align:left;" | needs to be run as a pilot first, to be designed with the community.
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" | TBD
| style="background-color:#E06666;" | P1
| style="background-color:#FF0; text-align:left;" | obtained consensus on "Importance"; not yet obtained consensus on "Urgency" <br />- 13 Apr 2022
| style="background-color:#FF0; text-align:left;" | obtained consensus on "Importance"; not yet obtained consensus on "Urgency" <br />- 13 Apr 2022
|-
|-
Line 184: Line 184:
| style="background-color:#E06666;" | P1
| style="background-color:#E06666;" | P1
| style="text-align:left;" | New review/program to be designed with each individual [[SO]]/[[AC]]/[[NomCom|NC]]
| style="text-align:left;" | New review/program to be designed with each individual [[SO]]/[[AC]]/[[NomCom|NC]]
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" | TBD
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="background-color:#FF0; text-align:left;" | obtained consensus on "Importance"; not yet obtained consensus on "Urgency" <br />- 19 Apr 2022
| style="background-color:#FF0; text-align:left;" | obtained consensus on "Importance"; not yet obtained consensus on "Urgency" <br />- 19 Apr 2022
|-
|-
Line 191: Line 191:
| style="background-color:#E06666;" | P1
| style="background-color:#E06666;" | P1
| style="text-align:left;" | This recommendation about [[RDAP]] is rated by the RDS-WHOIS2 as high.
| style="text-align:left;" | This recommendation about [[RDAP]] is rated by the RDS-WHOIS2 as high.
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" | TBD
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="background-color:#FF0; text-align:left;" | skip for now due to lack of information<br />- 19 April 2022
| style="background-color:#FF0; text-align:left;" | skip for now due to lack of information<br />- 19 April 2022
|-
|-
Line 198: Line 198:
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="text-align:left;" | fold into a voluntary pilot survey of [[CPH|contracted parties]].
| style="text-align:left;" | fold into a voluntary pilot survey of [[CPH|contracted parties]].
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" | TBD
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
|-
|-
Line 205: Line 205:
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8; text-align:left;" |  
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8; text-align:left;" |  
| style="text-align:left;" | ditto
| style="text-align:left;" | ditto
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" | TBD
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
|-
|-
Line 212: Line 212:
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="text-align:left;" | ditto
| style="text-align:left;" | ditto
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" | TBD
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
|-
|-
Line 219: Line 219:
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="text-align:left;" | ditto
| style="text-align:left;" | ditto
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" | TBD
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
|-
|-
Line 226: Line 226:
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8; text-align:left;" |  
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8; text-align:left;" |  
| style="text-align:left;" | ditto
| style="text-align:left;" | ditto
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" | TBD
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
|-
|-
Line 233: Line 233:
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="text-align:left;" | rated by the CCT-RT as high.
| style="text-align:left;" | rated by the CCT-RT as high.
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" | TBD
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
|-
|-
Line 240: Line 240:
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="text-align:left;" | ditto
| style="text-align:left;" | ditto
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" | TBD
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
|-
|-
Line 247: Line 247:
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="text-align:left;" | ditto
| style="text-align:left;" | ditto
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" | TBD
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
|-
|-
Line 254: Line 254:
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="text-align:left;" | included in the next round of contractual negotiations with the contracted parties
| style="text-align:left;" | included in the next round of contractual negotiations with the contracted parties
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" | TBD
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
|-
|-
Line 261: Line 261:
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="text-align:left;" | ditto
| style="text-align:left;" | ditto
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" | TBD
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
|-
|-
Line 268: Line 268:
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="text-align:left;" | determined by SSR2 as a medium priority
| style="text-align:left;" | determined by SSR2 as a medium priority
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" | TBD
| style="background-color:#E06666;" | P1
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
|-
|-
Line 275: Line 275:
| style="background-color:#C9DAF8;" | P3
| style="background-color:#C9DAF8;" | P3
| style="text-align:left;" | determined by CCT-RT as a low priority
| style="text-align:left;" | determined by CCT-RT as a low priority
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" | TBD
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
|-
|-
Line 282: Line 282:
| style="background-color:#C9DAF8;" | P3
| style="background-color:#C9DAF8;" | P3
| style="text-align:left;" | determined by CCT-RT as a low priority
| style="text-align:left;" | determined by CCT-RT as a low priority
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" | TBD
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
|-
|-
Line 289: Line 289:
| style="background-color:#C9DAF8;" | P3
| style="background-color:#C9DAF8;" | P3
| style="background-color:#FFF; text-align:left;" | May include dependencies on [[Expedited Policy Development Process on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data|EPDP related work]]  
| style="background-color:#FFF; text-align:left;" | May include dependencies on [[Expedited Policy Development Process on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data|EPDP related work]]  
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" | TBD
| style="background-color:#C9DAF8;" | P3
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
|-
|-
Line 296: Line 296:
| style="background-color:#C9DAF8;" | P3
| style="background-color:#C9DAF8;" | P3
| style="background-color:#FFF; text-align:left;" | Dependent on completion on SSR2 Review Rec 23.2.
| style="background-color:#FFF; text-align:left;" | Dependent on completion on SSR2 Review Rec 23.2.
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" | TBD
| style="background-color:#C9DAF8;" | P3
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
|-
|-
Line 303: Line 303:
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="text-align:left;" | implemented in 2021
| style="text-align:left;" | implemented in 2021
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" | TBD
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
|-
|-
Line 310: Line 310:
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="text-align:left;" | ditto
| style="text-align:left;" | ditto
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" | TBD
| style="background-color:#B6D7A8;" | P2
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
|-
|-
Line 317: Line 317:
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="text-align:left;" | determined by ATRT3 as a low priority
| style="text-align:left;" | determined by ATRT3 as a low priority
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" | TBD
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
|-
|-
Line 324: Line 324:
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="text-align:left;" | Work is underway to determine which measures are needed to ensure that appropriate information on Caucus group activities is provided to the community.
| style="text-align:left;" | Work is underway to determine which measures are needed to ensure that appropriate information on Caucus group activities is provided to the community.
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" | TBD
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
|-
|-
Line 331: Line 331:
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="text-align:left;" | Updates to web documentation were made - action needed on the need to include users/focus groups.
| style="text-align:left;" | Updates to web documentation were made - action needed on the need to include users/focus groups.
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" | TBD
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
|-
|-
Line 338: Line 338:
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="text-align:left;" | ditto
| style="text-align:left;" | ditto
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" | TBD
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
|-
|-
Line 345: Line 345:
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="text-align:left;" | ICANN org conducted a study on the topic of [[Expedited Policy Development Process on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data#EPDP Phase 2A|differentiation of legal vs. natural persons' registration data]]; two surveys on the Standardized System for Access and Disclosure ([[SSAD]]) Operational Design Phase ([[ODP]]). ICANN org is working on streamlined [[AC#Procedure and Process|mechanisms to request, receive, and gather feedback]] from the community and stakeholders
| style="text-align:left;" | ICANN org conducted a study on the topic of [[Expedited Policy Development Process on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data#EPDP Phase 2A|differentiation of legal vs. natural persons' registration data]]; two surveys on the Standardized System for Access and Disclosure ([[SSAD]]) Operational Design Phase ([[ODP]]). ICANN org is working on streamlined [[AC#Procedure and Process|mechanisms to request, receive, and gather feedback]] from the community and stakeholders
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" | TBD
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
|-
|-
Line 352: Line 352:
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="text-align:left;" | ditto
| style="text-align:left;" | ditto
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" | TBD
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
|-
|-
Line 359: Line 359:
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="text-align:left;" | already implemented or need to be retired due to Internet landscape changes
| style="text-align:left;" | already implemented or need to be retired due to Internet landscape changes
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" | TBD
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
|-
|-
Line 366: Line 366:
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="text-align:left;" | determined by SSR2 as a low priority
| style="text-align:left;" | determined by SSR2 as a low priority
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" | TBD
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
|-
|-
Line 373: Line 373:
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="background-color:#FFF; text-align:left;" | determined by SSR2 as a low priority
| style="background-color:#FFF; text-align:left;" | determined by SSR2 as a low priority
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" | TBD
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
|-
|-
Line 380: Line 380:
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="text-align:left;" | implemented as part of [[Information Transparency Initiative]]
| style="text-align:left;" | implemented as part of [[Information Transparency Initiative]]
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" | TBD
| style="background-color:#FFF2CC;" | P4
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
| style="background-color:#FCE5CD; text-align:left;" |  
|}
|}
Line 457: Line 457:
| 45
| 45
|}
|}
 
==Prioritization in Reality==
At [[ICANN 74]], ICANN Org and the board asked the community which the org should prioritize, [[SSAD]] Light or the [[SubPro]] [[ODA]]. In response, the [[GNSO Council]] sent a letter to the board on July 5, highlighting the importance of both projects and saying to do both in parallel.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/fouquart-to-botterman-05jul22-en.pdf RE: Status Update EPDP Phase 2 and Review of the Operational Design Assessment, GNSO Council to ICANN Board]</ref> The org expects the latest version of the SSAD Light to be completed by ICANN 75 and the Subpro ODA to be completed by December 12, 2022.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/blogs/details/icann-moves-ahead-on-subpro-odp-and-whois-disclosure-system-design-initiatives-14-07-2022-en ICANN Moves Ahead on SubPro ODP and WHOIS Disclosure System Design Initiatives, Blogs, ICANN]</ref>
==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}


[[Category:Frameworks]]
[[Category:Frameworks]]
[[Category:Concepts]]
Retrieved from "https://staging.icannwiki.org/Prioritization_Framework"