Generic Names Supporting Organization: Difference between revisions

MakennaGal (talk | contribs)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 83: Line 83:
The GNSO has sought to identify ways to improve the inclusiveness and representativeness of its work while increasing its effectiveness and efficiency, which has led to several updates to the process.   
The GNSO has sought to identify ways to improve the inclusiveness and representativeness of its work while increasing its effectiveness and efficiency, which has led to several updates to the process.   


====GNSO Improvements, 2007-2012====
====GNSO Improvements, 2007-2012 (PDP 2.0)====
The [[First GNSO Organizational Review]], initated in 2007, resulted in a set of recommendations for improving the effectiveness of the GNSO. These recommendations were related to GNSO activities, operations, and structure.
The [[First GNSO Organizational Review]], initiated in 2007, resulted in a set of recommendations for improving the effectiveness of the GNSO. These recommendations were related to GNSO activities, operations, and structure.
 
[[Jeff Neuman]] and [[J. Scott Evans]] chaired the working groups tasked with the PDP 2.0 revisions with J. Scott heading the group on revisions to the Working Group model and [[Jeff Neuman]] heading the group  on recommendations to revise the Policy Development Process.


The main areas of GNSO improvements approved by the ICANN Board fell into five categories:
The main areas of GNSO improvements approved by the ICANN Board fell into five categories:
Line 98: Line 100:


At [[ICANN 70]], [[Bertrand de la Chapelle]] participated in an ALAC session on "Reimagining ICANN’s Role; Responding to National Pressures."<ref>[https://70.schedule.icann.org/meetings/BkrH93jYyy6z56xEn ICANN 70 Archive: Reimagining ICANN's Role], March 23, 2021 (registration/login required)</ref> During a conversation about silos and their impact on the [[Multistakeholder Model|multistakeholder model]], de la Chapelle recalled the introduction of the two houses approach and offered this critique of the mindset of the working group participants:
At [[ICANN 70]], [[Bertrand de la Chapelle]] participated in an ALAC session on "Reimagining ICANN’s Role; Responding to National Pressures."<ref>[https://70.schedule.icann.org/meetings/BkrH93jYyy6z56xEn ICANN 70 Archive: Reimagining ICANN's Role], March 23, 2021 (registration/login required)</ref> During a conversation about silos and their impact on the [[Multistakeholder Model|multistakeholder model]], de la Chapelle recalled the introduction of the two houses approach and offered this critique of the mindset of the working group participants:
<blockquote>...I participated in one of the calls that led to the restructuring of the GNSO and the creation of the two houses. If I can give a very frank assessment from the outside, I immediately felt that the main objective of the different entities and the different soon-to-become houses was to make sure one thing: that the other halves could not impose anything on them, period. Nothing was about how can we make it better so that we can solve problems together? I’m caricaturing a little bit, but I can tell you this was the feeling that I had exactly at the moment the proposal was made on the call. And I feel that it has remained a little bit in this way.<ref>[https://cdn.filestackcontent.com/content=t:attachment,f:%22I70CUN-Tue23Mar2021__At-Large%20Policy%20Sess-ICANN%20MultiS%20Model-New%20Legiss%20and%20Regs%20Chall%20and%20Opps-en.pdf Transcript of "Reimagining ICANN's Role"], March 23, 2021 (registration/login required)</ref></blockquote>
<blockquote>...I participated in one of the calls that led to the restructuring of the GNSO and the creation of the two houses. If I can give a very frank assessment from the outside, I immediately felt that the main objective of the different entities and the different soon-to-become houses was to make sure one thing: that the other halves could not impose anything on them, period. Nothing was about how can we make it better so that we can solve problems together? I'm caricaturing a little bit, but I can tell you this was the feeling that I had exactly at the moment the proposal was made on the call. And I feel that it has remained a little bit in this way.<ref>[https://cdn.filestackcontent.com/content=t:attachment,f:%22I70CUN-Tue23Mar2021__At-Large%20Policy%20Sess-ICANN%20MultiS%20Model-New%20Legiss%20and%20Regs%20Chall%20and%20Opps-en.pdf Transcript of "Reimagining ICANN's Role"], March 23, 2021 (registration/login required)</ref></blockquote>


====PDP 3.0====
====PDP 3.0====
Line 121: Line 123:
=====Implementation=====
=====Implementation=====
A small team of GNSO Councilors led the implementation of PDP 3.0:  
A small team of GNSO Councilors led the implementation of PDP 3.0:  
* [[Arsene Tungali]] (Non-Commerical Stakeholder Group)
* [[Arsene Tungali]] (Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group)
* [[Darcy Southwell]] (Registrar Stakeholder Group)
* [[Darcy Southwell]] (Registrar Stakeholder Group)
* [[Elsa Saade]] (Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group)
* [[Elsa Saade]] (Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group)
Line 161: Line 163:


[[Category: ICANN Bodies]]
[[Category: ICANN Bodies]]
[[Category:ICANN]]