More thoughts: new section
Line 26: Line 26:


Can you make a stab at making the eNom article more "Neutral" in tone?  This article may help: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view NPOV] article on Wikipedia.  You don't need to read it all...  Check out the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enom eNom article] on Wikipedia too.
Can you make a stab at making the eNom article more "Neutral" in tone?  This article may help: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view NPOV] article on Wikipedia.  You don't need to read it all...  Check out the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enom eNom article] on Wikipedia too.
== More thoughts ==
* I don't think I deleted the people section in the [[MarkMonitor]] article.  You can "step thru" the article history to see all of the edits (worthwhile to see how that works anyway).
* would be great to add an "info box" to the company articles (as you'd see in WikiPedia articles).  This takes some formatting, but I think you can follow what Wikipedia has done.
* greater focus on [[NPOV]] would be great, we really want the articles to stand out as being NOT written by the companies themselves, but rather by neutral observers.