Generic Names Supporting Organization: Difference between revisions

Line 90:

====PDP 3.0====

=====The ~~recommended improvements~~=====

=====The 14 Accepted Recommendations=====

~~Recommendations:~~

# Terms of participation for working group members

# Consider alternatives to open working group model

# Criteria for joining of new members after a PDP working group is formed or

# Criteria for joining of new members after a PDP working group is formed or re-chartered

re-chartered

# Consensus playbook

# Active role for and clear description of Council liaison to PDP working groups

# Document expectations for working group leaders that outline role &

# Document expectations for working group leaders that outline role & responsibilities as well as minimum skills/expertise required

responsibilities as well as minimum skills/expertise required

# Provide further guidance for section 3.6 (Standard Methodology for Decision Making) and clarification of section 3.7 in the GNSO Working Group Guidelines

# Provide further guidance for section 3.6 (Standard Methodology for Decision

Making) and clarification of section 3.7 in the GNSO Working Group Guidelines

# Enforce deadlines and ensure bite-size pieces

# Notification to Council of changes in the work plan

# Review of working group leadership

# Make better use of existing flexibility in PDP to allow for data gathering,

# Make better use of existing flexibility in PDP to allow for data gathering, chartering, and termination when it is clear that no consensus can be achieved

chartering and termination when it is clear that no consensus can be achieved

# Independent conflict resolution

# Criteria for PDP working group updates

# Resource reporting for PDP working groups

=====Implementation=====

A small team of GNSO Councilors led the implementation of PDP 3.0:

@@ Line 90: / Line 90: @@
 ====PDP 3.0====
-=====The recommended improvements=====
+=====The 14 Accepted Recommendations=====
-Recommendations:
 # Terms of participation for working group members
 # Consider alternatives to open working group model
-# Criteria for joining of new members after a PDP working group is formed or
+# Criteria for joining of new members after a PDP working group is formed or re-chartered
-re-chartered
 # Consensus playbook
 # Active role for and clear description of Council liaison to PDP working groups
-# Document expectations for working group leaders that outline role &
+# Document expectations for working group leaders that outline role & responsibilities as well as minimum skills/expertise required
-responsibilities as well as minimum skills/expertise required
+# Provide further guidance for section 3.6 (Standard Methodology for Decision Making) and clarification of section 3.7 in the GNSO Working Group Guidelines
-# Provide further guidance for section 3.6 (Standard Methodology for Decision
-Making) and clarification of section 3.7 in the GNSO Working Group Guidelines
 # Enforce deadlines and ensure bite-size pieces
 # Notification to Council of changes in the work plan
 # Review of working group leadership
-# Make better use of existing flexibility in PDP to allow for data gathering,
+# Make better use of existing flexibility in PDP to allow for data gathering, chartering, and termination when it is clear that no consensus can be achieved
-chartering and termination when it is clear that no consensus can be achieved
 # Independent conflict resolution
 # Criteria for PDP working group updates
 # Resource reporting for PDP working groups
 =====Implementation=====
 A small team of GNSO Councilors led the implementation of PDP 3.0: