2002 Evolution and Reform Process: Difference between revisions
| Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
The proposal outlined the following structure and composition for the NomCom: | The proposal outlined the following structure and composition for the NomCom: | ||
<blockquote>The NomCom would initially be a 19-member body composed of delegates (not representatives) appointed by the following constituencies: | <blockquote>The NomCom would initially be a 19-member body composed of delegates (not representatives) appointed by the following constituencies: | ||
* gTLD registries (1) | |||
* gTLD registrars (1) | |||
* ccTLD registries (1) | |||
* Address registries (1) | |||
* Internet service providers (1) | |||
* Large business users (1) | |||
* Small business users (1) | |||
* IP organizations (1) | |||
* Academic and other public entities (1) | |||
* Consumer and civil society group[s (1) | |||
* Individual domain name holders (1) | |||
* IAB/IETF (1) | |||
* TAC (1) | |||
* GAC (1) | |||
* Unaffiliated public interest persons (4) | |||
In addition there would be a Chair appointed by the Board and 2 non-voting liaisons, one from each of the RSSAC and the SAC. The above represents a workable balance among providers, users, technical and public interests.<ref name="blueprint" /></blockquote> | In addition there would be a Chair appointed by the Board and 2 non-voting liaisons, one from each of the RSSAC and the SAC. The above represents a workable balance among providers, users, technical and public interests.<ref name="blueprint" /></blockquote> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||