Reconsideration: Difference between revisions
| Line 800: | Line 800: | ||
| No action taken | | No action taken | ||
| "There is no indication that: (i) ICANN staff violated established policy or procedure by determining that certain documents sought in the Second Financial Data DIDP Request were subject to DIDP Defined Conditions for Nondisclosure; or (ii) ICANN staff violated established policy or procedure by determining that certain documents sought in the Second NETmundial DIDP Request fell outside the scope of the DIDP." | | "There is no indication that: (i) ICANN staff violated established policy or procedure by determining that certain documents sought in the Second Financial Data DIDP Request were subject to DIDP Defined Conditions for Nondisclosure; or (ii) ICANN staff violated established policy or procedure by determining that certain documents sought in the Second NETmundial DIDP Request fell outside the scope of the DIDP." | ||
|- | |||
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/reconsideration-15-16-cpa-australia-2015-09-18-en 15-16:] CPA Australia Ltd | |||
| Requester did not prevail in its [[Community Priority Evaluation]] for [[.cpa]] | |||
| No* | |||
| Deny | |||
| | |||
| No proper grounds for reconsideration | |||
|- | |||
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/reconsideration-15-17-aicpa-2015-09-25-en 15-17:] American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) | |||
| Requester did not prevail in its [[Community Priority Evaluation]] for [[.cpa]] | |||
| No* | |||
| Deny | |||
| | |||
| No proper grounds for reconsideration | |||
|- | |||
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/reconsideration-15-18-andruff-2015-10-12-en 15-18:] [[Ron Andruff]] | |||
| Reconsideration of the BGC's decision not to recommend Mr. Andruff for 2016 [[NomCom]] chair and the Board's apppointment of [[Stephane Van Gelder]] as 2016 NomCom chair. | |||
| No | |||
| Deny | |||
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2015-10-21-en Denied by resolution of the Board] | |||
| No proper grounds for reconsideration; however, BGC thanked Mr. Andruff for his commitment to the ICANN Community and suggested that he be given an opportunity to address the Board regarding his request. The Board followed that suggestion.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/minutes-2015-10-21-en Board Meeting Minutes], October 21, 2015</ref> | |||
|- | |||
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/reconsideration-15-19-bc-ncsg-2015-10-13-en 15-19:] [[Business Constituency]], [[Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group], and [[Internet Commerce Association]] | |||
| Reconsideration of the Board's approval of renewals of registry agreements for legacy TLDs [[.cat]], [[.pro]], and [[.travel]] | |||
| No | |||
| Deny | |||
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-02-03-en#2.b Denied by resolution of the Board] | |||
| "The Requesters claim, without support, that ICANN staff unilaterally imposed the New gTLD Registry Agreement as a starting point for the Renewed Registry Agreements and, therefore, "transform[ed] the PDDRP and URS into de facto Consensus Policies without following the procedures laid out in ICANN's Bylaws for their creation." Contrary to what the Requesters claim, while the registry operators had a presumptive right of renewal under the terms of their existing legacy registry agreement, they chose to re-negotiate and renew their agreements based upon the New gTLD Registry Agreement terms." | |||
|} | |} | ||