Prioritization Framework: Difference between revisions

Line 57:

====Recommendations Considered during the Pilot====

In total, 45 recommendations were considered during the pilot, of which the following were deemed urgent and important (and thus, priority level 1):<ref>[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1HNnH4Wi2wmHqQcQ1hbT0pCY9Mz_moHEIiMvNZtN977U/edit#gid=2036121294 Prioritization Pilot Recommendations Spreadsheet, PPG, ICANN]</ref>

=====Priority Level 1=====

* Recs 3.1-3.6 from the ATRT3

** Suspend RDS reviews

** One clearly scoped CCT Review that starts two years after the next round of new gTLDs and lasts one year. A framework of data collection must precede the next round of gTLDs prior to review member selection

** ATRT Reviews should continue but shall start no later than two years after the approval by the Board of the first recommendation of the Holistic Review; recommend whether the Board should terminate or amend other periodic reviews or create periodic reviews; all documentation required for the review shall be available at the first meeting of the review team when terms of reference shall be established.

** The holistic review should: start no later than a year after the board's approval of the ATRT3 recommendation and then every two-and-a-half years after and all other reviews should be suspended while a Holistic Review is active (a maximum of 18 months; review continuous improvement efforts of SO/AC/NC based on good practices, the effectiveness of collaboration mechanisms, accountability of ICANN Community to their members/constituencies (survey results), and SO/AC/NCs' purpose in the ICANN structure, possible changes in structures and operations to reflect the representation of community views

* Recs 1, 8, 11, and 13.1,2,4 from the CCT

* Rec 11.2 from the RDS-Whois2

@@ Line 57: / Line 57: @@
 ====Recommendations Considered during the Pilot====
 In total, 45 recommendations were considered during the pilot, of which the following were deemed urgent and important (and thus, priority level 1):<ref>[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1HNnH4Wi2wmHqQcQ1hbT0pCY9Mz_moHEIiMvNZtN977U/edit#gid=2036121294 Prioritization Pilot Recommendations Spreadsheet, PPG, ICANN]</ref>
+=====Priority Level 1=====
 * Recs 3.1-3.6 from the ATRT3
+** Suspend RDS reviews
+** One clearly scoped CCT Review that starts two years after the next round of new gTLDs and lasts one year. A framework of data collection must precede the next round of gTLDs prior to review member selection
+** ATRT Reviews should continue but shall start no later than two years after the approval by the Board of the first recommendation of the Holistic Review; recommend whether the Board should terminate or amend other periodic reviews or create periodic reviews; all documentation required for the review shall be available at the first meeting of the review team when terms of reference shall be established.
+** The holistic review should: start no later than a year after the board's approval of the ATRT3 recommendation and then every two-and-a-half years after and all other reviews should be suspended while a Holistic Review is active (a maximum of 18 months; review continuous improvement efforts of SO/AC/NC based on good practices, the effectiveness of collaboration mechanisms, accountability of ICANN Community to their members/constituencies (survey results), and SO/AC/NCs' purpose in the ICANN structure, possible changes in structures and operations to reflect the representation of community views
 * Recs 1, 8, 11, and 13.1,2,4 from the CCT
 * Rec 11.2 from the RDS-Whois2