ICANN 74: Difference between revisions

Line 17:

===Policy Forum===

# DNS Abuse:

#* The [[ALAC]] held a session on DNS abuse from the end user's perspective. The session focused on what the [[RALO]]s ~~can do~~ to ~~curtail~~ abuse.

#* The [[ALAC]] identified DNS Abuse as a top priority during its leadership session on the first day of the meeting.<ref>[https://74.schedule.icann.org/meetings/gFkaacMWpYM2696yt ICANN 74 Archive - At-Large Leadership Session: Welcome to ICANN 74], June 13, 2022</ref>. ALAC members also held a session on DNS abuse from the end user's perspective. The session focused on what the [[RALO]]s were doing to address abuse.

#** [[Leon Sanchez]] opened the discussion by stressing the need for a consensus definition of [[DNS Abuse]], as well as improving understanding of the approaches to and interests in DNS Abuse responses from different stakeholders. [[Graeme Bunton]] intervened later in the meeting, noting that there was no need to gain consensus on a definition in order to move forward. Stating that it would be very easy to spend endless hours defining the edges of the term, Bunton urged participants to focus on solutions.

#** [[Joanna Kulesza]], acting as moderator noted that there is no current policy development platform within ICANN for addressing DNS Abuse, although it is a topic in numerous other policy processes;

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 ===Policy Forum===
 # DNS Abuse:
-#* The [[ALAC]] held a session on DNS abuse from the end user's perspective. The session focused on what the [[RALO]]s can do to curtail abuse.
+#* The [[ALAC]] identified DNS Abuse as a top priority during its leadership session on the first day of the meeting.<ref>[https://74.schedule.icann.org/meetings/gFkaacMWpYM2696yt ICANN 74 Archive - At-Large Leadership Session: Welcome to ICANN 74], June 13, 2022</ref>. ALAC members also held a session on DNS abuse from the end user's perspective. The session focused on what the [[RALO]]s were doing to address abuse.
 #** [[Leon Sanchez]] opened the discussion by stressing the need for a consensus definition of [[DNS Abuse]], as well as improving understanding of the approaches to and interests in DNS Abuse responses from different stakeholders. [[Graeme Bunton]] intervened later in the meeting, noting that there was no need to gain consensus on a definition in order to move forward. Stating that it would be very easy to spend endless hours defining the edges of the term, Bunton urged participants to focus on solutions.
 #** [[Joanna Kulesza]], acting as moderator noted that there is no current policy development platform within ICANN for addressing DNS Abuse, although it is a topic in numerous other policy processes;