Closed Generics: Difference between revisions

Line 9:

In view of the need for clarity on this issue for the next gTLD application round, the Board invites the GNSO Council and the GAC to explore a mutually agreeable way forward, for which the Board could facilitate a dialogue to formulate a workable framework to identify and handle closed generic applications for the immediate next round of new gTLDs.<ref>[https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2022/correspondence/botterman-et-al-to-fouquart-et-al-06mar22-en.pdf GNSO Workspace - Letter from Maarten Botterman to Phillipe Fouquart & Manal Ismail], March 6, 2022</ref></blockquote>

The Board requested a Framing Paper from ICANN org to present a more detailed scope and methodology for the dialogue between the two organizations.<ref name="cgframing">[https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2022/correspondence/gnso-council-et-al-to-fouqaurt-08mar22-en.pdf GNSO Workspace - Letter from Maarten Botterman to Phillipe Fouquart & Manal Ismail], March 8, 2022</ref>

===ICANN 74===

At ICANN 74,

* [[Kathy Kleiman]] noted that the Framing Paper does not fully discuss worldwide objections and deep concerns raised by GAC and the world in 2012-3 and said it would be useful for the GAC to review the dozens of Early Warnings filed by individual GAC members and comments of concern to the Board from small businesses, organizations and individuals around the world.

* [[Jorge Cancio]] discussed the desire to avoid extreme views (completely bar or allow a free for all), to allow ALAC to be part of the process, and the hunt for a fair facilitator.

==References==

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 In view of the need for clarity on this issue for the next gTLD application round, the Board invites the GNSO Council and the GAC to explore a mutually agreeable way forward, for which the Board could facilitate a dialogue to formulate a workable framework to identify and handle closed generic applications for the immediate next round of new gTLDs.<ref>[https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2022/correspondence/botterman-et-al-to-fouquart-et-al-06mar22-en.pdf GNSO Workspace - Letter from Maarten Botterman to Phillipe Fouquart & Manal Ismail], March 6, 2022</ref></blockquote>
 The Board requested a Framing Paper from ICANN org to present a more detailed scope and methodology for the dialogue between the two organizations.<ref name="cgframing">[https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2022/correspondence/gnso-council-et-al-to-fouqaurt-08mar22-en.pdf GNSO Workspace - Letter from Maarten Botterman to Phillipe Fouquart & Manal Ismail], March 8, 2022</ref>
+===ICANN 74===
+At ICANN 74,
+* [[Kathy Kleiman]] noted that the Framing Paper does not fully discuss worldwide objections and deep concerns raised by GAC and the world in 2012-3 and said it would be useful for the GAC to review the dozens of Early Warnings filed by individual GAC members and comments of concern to the Board from small businesses, organizations and individuals around the world.
+* [[Jorge Cancio]] discussed the desire to avoid extreme views (completely bar or allow a free for all), to allow ALAC to be part of the process, and the hunt for a fair facilitator.
 ==References==