NetNames: Difference between revisions
Applied modification ruleset: Automated workflow |
Applied modification ruleset: Corrections using AWB-ICW patterns |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
==ICANN Involvement== | ==ICANN Involvement== | ||
NetNames is active in [[ICANN]]. Some of its latest participation was during ICANN's global consultation outreach for | NetNames is active in [[ICANN]]. Some of its latest participation was during ICANN's global consultation outreach for the implementation of the [[New gTLD Program|new gTLD program]] held in London on July 15, 2009.<ref>[http://www.netnames.co.uk/resources/news/2009/netnames-participates-icanns-london-outreach-event NetNames participates at ICANN's London outreach event]</ref> The company also provided comments on the issue of Trademark Protection for new gTLDs in response to the [[IRT]] Report. The following comments were submitted to the ICANN forum:<ref>[http://forum.icann.org/lists/irt-draft-report/pdfUM2QniWBC3.pdf A response to the 24 April 2009 draft output from ICANN’s IRT]</ref> | ||
* NetNames recognized the importance of the [[IP Clearinghouse]] to protect the rights of new [[TLD]]s and it agreed to the idea that the services should be technically state-of-the-art and support open communication standards. The company suggested that the IP Clearinghouse should be developed through an open competition among service providers. | * NetNames recognized the importance of the [[IP Clearinghouse]] to protect the rights of new [[TLD]]s and it agreed to the idea that the services should be technically state-of-the-art and support open communication standards. The company suggested that the IP Clearinghouse should be developed through an open competition among service providers. | ||
* The proposal regarding the Globally Protected Marks List needs a careful evaluation. | * The proposal regarding the Globally Protected Marks List needs a careful evaluation. | ||