Second Accountability and Transparency Review: Difference between revisions

Line 62:

#Reviewing the extent to which assessments and actions undertaken by ICANN have been successful in ensuring that ICANN is acting transparently, is accountable for its decision-making, and acts in the public interest.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/atrt/Work+Streams ATRT2 Workspace - Work Streams], last updated May 30, 2013</ref>

In addition, the review team determined that an outside consultant would be a useful addition to the review process. The consultant would be tasked with a fifth area of investigation: whether the [[GNSO]] [[Policy Development Process|policy development process]] was supportive of and answerable to ICANN's [[Multistakeholder Model|multistakeholder model]] of decision making. A request for proposals was posted July of 2013, and on August 17, 2013, the review team announced that it had selected [[InterConnect Communications]] (ICC) to serve as its independent expert.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/atrt/Independent+Expert ATRT2 Workspace - Independent Expert Selection], August 17, 2013</ref>

In addition, the review team determined that an outside consultant would be a useful addition to the review process. The consultant would be tasked with a fifth area of investigation: whether the [[GNSO]] [[Policy Development Process|policy development process]] was supportive of and answerable to ICANN's [[Multistakeholder Model|multistakeholder model]] of decision making. A request for proposals was posted July 2013, and on August 17, 2013, the review team announced that it had selected [[InterConnect Communications]] (ICC) to serve as its independent expert.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/atrt/Independent+Expert ATRT2 Workspace - Independent Expert Selection], August 17, 2013</ref>

ICC presented its final report on the GNSO PDP process in November 2013.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/gnso-evaluation-21nov13-en.pdf GNSO PDP Evaluation], November 21, 2013</ref> Meanwhile, the review team relied on the research and findings of the various work streams to create its draft report and recommendations. The draft report was published for public comment on October 21, 2013.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/public-comments/atrt2-recommendations-2013-10-21-en ICANN Public Comment Proceeding - ATRT2 Draft Report]</ref> The draft recommendations received over thirty comments from organizations and individuals.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/summary-comments-atrt2-recommendations-03feb14-en.pdf Summary Report of Public Comment Proceeding], February 3, 2014</ref>

@@ Line 62: / Line 62: @@
 #Reviewing the extent to which assessments and actions undertaken by ICANN have been successful in ensuring that ICANN is acting transparently, is accountable for its decision-making, and acts in the public interest.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/atrt/Work+Streams ATRT2 Workspace - Work Streams], last updated May 30, 2013</ref>
-In addition, the review team determined that an outside consultant would be a useful addition to the review process. The consultant would be tasked with a fifth area of investigation: whether the [[GNSO]] [[Policy Development Process|policy development process]] was supportive of and answerable to ICANN's [[Multistakeholder Model|multistakeholder model]] of decision making. A request for proposals was posted July of 2013, and on August 17, 2013, the review team announced that it had selected [[InterConnect Communications]] (ICC) to serve as its independent expert.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/atrt/Independent+Expert ATRT2 Workspace - Independent Expert Selection], August 17, 2013</ref>
+In addition, the review team determined that an outside consultant would be a useful addition to the review process. The consultant would be tasked with a fifth area of investigation: whether the [[GNSO]] [[Policy Development Process|policy development process]] was supportive of and answerable to ICANN's [[Multistakeholder Model|multistakeholder model]] of decision making. A request for proposals was posted July 2013, and on August 17, 2013, the review team announced that it had selected [[InterConnect Communications]] (ICC) to serve as its independent expert.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/atrt/Independent+Expert ATRT2 Workspace - Independent Expert Selection], August 17, 2013</ref>
 ICC presented its final report on the GNSO PDP process in November 2013.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/gnso-evaluation-21nov13-en.pdf GNSO PDP Evaluation], November 21, 2013</ref> Meanwhile, the review team relied on the research and findings of the various work streams to create its draft report and recommendations. The draft report was published for public comment on October 21, 2013.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/public-comments/atrt2-recommendations-2013-10-21-en ICANN Public Comment Proceeding - ATRT2 Draft Report]</ref> The draft recommendations received over thirty comments from organizations and individuals.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/summary-comments-atrt2-recommendations-03feb14-en.pdf Summary Report of Public Comment Proceeding], February 3, 2014</ref>