Policy Development Process for New gTLD Subsequent Procedures: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
Applied modification ruleset: Corrections using AWB-ICW patterns |
||
| Line 374: | Line 374: | ||
===Reactions to the ODA=== | ===Reactions to the ODA=== | ||
On January 20, 2023, the GNSO Council provided feedback to the ICANN Board about the SubPro ODA. The Council encouraged the ICANN Board to adopt the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Final Report ASAP. In particular, the Small Team: | On January 20, 2023, the GNSO Council provided feedback to the ICANN Board about the SubPro ODA. The Council encouraged the ICANN Board to adopt the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Final Report ASAP. In particular, the Small Team: | ||
*explained that it | *explained that it couldn't differentiate Options 1 and 2 and their impacts on the overall new gTLD program; | ||
*believed that the bulk of the applications would come in the first cycle, regardless of what ICANN org internally designs; | *believed that the bulk of the applications would come in the first cycle, regardless of what ICANN org internally designs; | ||
*suggested that the next round should not be more complex or time and resource intensive than is necessary; | *suggested that the next round should not be more complex or time and resource intensive than is necessary; | ||