Data Escrow: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Glossary| | |||
|note = This article is neutral, but is [[Sponsorship|sponsored]] by [[Iron Mountain]].<br/>Iron Mountain is an information & intellectual property<br/>management company and data escrow provicer.<br/>You can read more about their services [http://www.ironmountain.com/ here]. | |||
|logo = IRON Mountain-Logo.png | |||
|silversponsor = ICANNWiki [[Sponsorship|Silver Sponsor]] | |||
}} | |||
'''Data Escrow''' is the act of storing data with a neutral third party<ref>[http://www.guard-it.com/faqs.html Guard-It.com FAQs]</ref> in case of registry or registrar failure, accreditation termination, or accreditation relapse without renewal. [[ICANN]] requires all registrars and gTLD registries to contract with a data escrow provider in order to safeguard registrants.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-09nov07-en.htm Implementation of Registrar Data Escrow Program, icann.org]</ref><ref>[http://archive.icann.org/en/tlds/data-escrow-report05mar07.htm ICANN's gTLD Registry Data Escrow Requirements, icann.org]</ref> | '''Data Escrow''' is the act of storing data with a neutral third party<ref>[http://www.guard-it.com/faqs.html Guard-It.com FAQs]</ref> in case of registry or registrar failure, accreditation termination, or accreditation relapse without renewal. [[ICANN]] requires all registrars and gTLD registries to contract with a data escrow provider in order to safeguard registrants.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-09nov07-en.htm Implementation of Registrar Data Escrow Program, icann.org]</ref><ref>[http://archive.icann.org/en/tlds/data-escrow-report05mar07.htm ICANN's gTLD Registry Data Escrow Requirements, icann.org]</ref> | ||
| Line 9: | Line 15: | ||
In November 2000, ICANN selected seven new gTLDs as part of a proof-of-concept round to expand the Internet name space. Registry Agreements for all 7 of these TLDs contained language based on the draft for the 2001 .com agreement with Verisign. These agreements were entered into between 2001 and 2002, beginning with [[.biz]] and [[.info]] in May 2001. | In November 2000, ICANN selected seven new gTLDs as part of a proof-of-concept round to expand the Internet name space. Registry Agreements for all 7 of these TLDs contained language based on the draft for the 2001 .com agreement with Verisign. These agreements were entered into between 2001 and 2002, beginning with [[.biz]] and [[.info]] in May 2001. | ||
[[Iron Mountain]] was selected in 2001 to serve as ICANN's preferred provider for registry data escrow.<ref>[http://www.ironmountain.com/Services/Technology-Escrow-Services/Domain-Name-Registry-Data-Escrow.aspx Domain Name Registry Data Escrow, icann.org]</ref> | |||
There are currently 4 active versions of the Registry Escrow Agreement. Most gTLDs use Version 1, which is based off of the 2001 .com agreement; Version 2 is used by [[.travel]]; Version 3 by the [[.aero]], [[.coop]], and [[.museum]] [[sTLD|Sponsored TLDs]]; and Version 4 by [[.name]] and [[.pro]]. | There are currently 4 active versions of the Registry Escrow Agreement. Most gTLDs use Version 1, which is based off of the 2001 .com agreement; Version 2 is used by [[.travel]]; Version 3 by the [[.aero]], [[.coop]], and [[.museum]] [[sTLD|Sponsored TLDs]]; and Version 4 by [[.name]] and [[.pro]]. | ||
Several of the original [[ccTLD]] Sponsorship Agreements and [[MoU]]s also contained provisions for registry escrow. In 2004, however, ICANN moved away from the Sponsorship Agreement and MOU formats, opting for a lightweight Accountability Format, which does not contain detailed provisions for registry escrow, though it does encourage ccTLD managers to operate in a manner complaint to current [[IETF]] standards.<ref>[http://archive.icann.org/en/tlds/data-escrow-report05mar07.htm#Historical ICANN's gTLD Registry Data Escrow Requirements, icann.org]</ref> | Several of the original [[ccTLD]] Sponsorship Agreements and [[MoU]]s also contained provisions for registry escrow. In 2004, however, ICANN moved away from the Sponsorship Agreement and MOU formats, opting for a lightweight Accountability Format, which does not contain detailed provisions for registry escrow, though it does encourage ccTLD managers to operate in a manner complaint to current [[IETF]] standards.<ref>[http://archive.icann.org/en/tlds/data-escrow-report05mar07.htm#Historical ICANN's gTLD Registry Data Escrow Requirements, icann.org]</ref> | ||
==Registrar Data Escrow== | ==Registrar Data Escrow== | ||