.security: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
# [[Symantec Corporation]]<ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/viewstatus Security Status, ICANN.org]</ref> | # [[Symantec Corporation]]<ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/viewstatus Security Status, ICANN.org]</ref> | ||
===European Commission | ===European Commission Communiqué=== | ||
The [[European Commission]] | The [[European Commission]] flagged all applications for .security outside of ICANN's defined remediation processes. | ||
Just after [[ICANN]]'s [[GAC]] issued its Early Warnings, which are advice given from one GAC member country to an applicant warning it of potential issues within its application, the [[European Commission]] issued a letter to all applicants within the [[New gTLD Program|new gTLD program]]. The letter highlights 58 applications that "could raise issues of compatibility with the existing legislation .. and/or with policy positions and objectives of the European Union." It notes a desire to open a dialogue with each offending applicant. | Just after [[ICANN]]'s [[GAC]] issued its Early Warnings, which are advice given from one GAC member country to an applicant warning it of potential issues within its application, the [[European Commission]] issued a letter to all applicants within the [[New gTLD Program|new gTLD program]]. The letter highlights 58 applications that "could raise issues of compatibility with the existing legislation .. and/or with policy positions and objectives of the European Union." It notes a desire to open a dialogue with each offending applicant. | ||