.security: Difference between revisions

Vivian (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 24: Line 24:
# [[Symantec Corporation]]<ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/viewstatus Security Status, ICANN.org]</ref>
# [[Symantec Corporation]]<ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/viewstatus Security Status, ICANN.org]</ref>


===European Commission Objection===
===European Commission Communiqué===
The [[European Commission]] objected to all applications for .security outside of ICANN's defined remediation processes.
The [[European Commission]] flagged all applications for .security outside of ICANN's defined remediation processes.


Just after [[ICANN]]'s [[GAC]] issued its Early Warnings, which are advice given from one GAC member country to an applicant warning it of potential issues within its application, the [[European Commission]] issued a letter to all applicants within the [[New gTLD Program|new gTLD program]]. The letter highlights 58 applications that "could raise issues of compatibility with the existing legislation .. and/or with policy positions and objectives of the European Union." It notes a desire to open a dialogue with each offending applicant.
Just after [[ICANN]]'s [[GAC]] issued its Early Warnings, which are advice given from one GAC member country to an applicant warning it of potential issues within its application, the [[European Commission]] issued a letter to all applicants within the [[New gTLD Program|new gTLD program]]. The letter highlights 58 applications that "could raise issues of compatibility with the existing legislation .. and/or with policy positions and objectives of the European Union." It notes a desire to open a dialogue with each offending applicant.