Name Collision: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
The report brought a possible new way forward for many New gTLD applicants.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/15925-new-gtld-registries-given-way-to-free-up-millions-of-blocked-names New gTLD Registries Given Way to Free up Millions of Blocked Names, DomainIncite] Retrieved 27 Feb 2014</ref> | The report brought a possible new way forward for many New gTLD applicants.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/15925-new-gtld-registries-given-way-to-free-up-millions-of-blocked-names New gTLD Registries Given Way to Free up Millions of Blocked Names, DomainIncite] Retrieved 27 Feb 2014</ref> | ||
The final draft of the report, "Mitigating the Risk of DNS Namespace Collisions Phase One", was published on June 10th. Important changes that were made because of a Public Comment Period for the document include a change of the Controlled Interruption Zone period from 120 to 90 days.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/name-collision-mitigation-study-06jun14-en.pdf Name Collision Mitigation Study Phase One] (6 June 2014) JAS Advisors ''ICANN.org'; Retrieved 11 June 2014 (PDF)</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
[[Category:Glossary]] | [[Category:Glossary]] | ||